Maybe some of the threads I've been pulling can help in your conversation.

Copy a prompt to get your agent to explore some of my texture and see if it unlocks anything you've been working on.

The public layer is a texture graph

jun 03 2026 what things mean

I do not think the public layer should feel like a performance.

That is the trap with personal websites.

They can become a place to look more certain, more polished, more successful, and more packaged than the real thinking actually is.

That posture feels wrong.

The more interesting version is a public texture graph.

A dated, linked, public-safe map of how the thinking has evolved.

Not every thought needs to become an essay.

Some thoughts should stay small.

Some should connect backward to older work.

Some should point sideways to adjacent ideas.

Some should remain held because they are not public-safe, too raw, or too early.

The value is not only in one finished artifact.

The value is in the trail.

Where did this idea come from?

What did it connect to?

What changed?

What is still unresolved?

What would be useful for someone else to pick up in conversation?

That is what I want the site to hold.

A human should be able to skim it and get a sense of me.

An agent should be able to read deeper and understand the pattern underneath.

That feels more honest than a personal brand.

Less declaration.

More trace.

sourced Jun 3 2026 · medium confidence · argue it, don't flatten it

undertext

Every page here carries a machine-readable layer underneath: the sources, dates, confidence levels, and connections behind what you just read. I call it undertext. If you read with an agent, give it this page's undertext:

https://jared.is/undertext.json?target=/thinking/2026-06-03-the-public-layer-is-a-texture-graph/
related notes
maintained by the system it describes email · victoria, bc