The archive should help agents ask better questions.
Summaries are useful.
But they are not the whole job.
If an agent reads the archive, it should understand enough to ask with better posture.
Where is the thinking confident?
Where is it unresolved?
Which ideas keep coming back?
Which routes should it read next?
What should it not infer?
That is a stronger use of the archive.
Not just “what does Jared think?”
More like:
What would be useful to ask Jared next?